<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Ugly Sites Perform Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/2009/08/09/do-ugly-sites-perform-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/2009/08/09/do-ugly-sites-perform-better/</link>
	<description>Warm breezes, sunshine, and random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:22:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: total wellness</title>
		<link>http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/2009/08/09/do-ugly-sites-perform-better/comment-page-1/#comment-81514</link>
		<dc:creator>total wellness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/?p=319#comment-81514</guid>
		<description>Content is Key.  Thank you for confirming this with your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content is Key.  Thank you for confirming this with your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filmari Nunti</title>
		<link>http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/2009/08/09/do-ugly-sites-perform-better/comment-page-1/#comment-81511</link>
		<dc:creator>Filmari Nunti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/?p=319#comment-81511</guid>
		<description>Ok, lets make ours sites very ugly and see if its works :)).

I think one of the reason besides what you mention its because they are in HTML ..no PHP or ASP.
They are clean and easy to crawl by Google.

Second reason - they are old. Its important for Google to have an old website.
I like your topics ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, lets make ours sites very ugly and see if its works <img src='http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
<p>I think one of the reason besides what you mention its because they are in HTML ..no PHP or ASP.<br />
They are clean and easy to crawl by Google.</p>
<p>Second reason &#8211; they are old. Its important for Google to have an old website.<br />
I like your topics <img src='http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homenotion</title>
		<link>http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/2009/08/09/do-ugly-sites-perform-better/comment-page-1/#comment-81224</link>
		<dc:creator>homenotion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/?p=319#comment-81224</guid>
		<description>Ugly sites do perform better.  That&#039;s because ugly site developers often concentrate more on their content, navigation, optimization and the ability to attract visitors, more than making the site &#039;pretty&#039;.  

It never hurts to have an attractive site but I&#039;d put more effort into making your site one that first grabs attention and offers useful, unique content.  The &#039;prettiness&#039; can come later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugly sites do perform better.  That&#8217;s because ugly site developers often concentrate more on their content, navigation, optimization and the ability to attract visitors, more than making the site &#8216;pretty&#8217;.  </p>
<p>It never hurts to have an attractive site but I&#8217;d put more effort into making your site one that first grabs attention and offers useful, unique content.  The &#8216;prettiness&#8217; can come later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Therabreath</title>
		<link>http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/2009/08/09/do-ugly-sites-perform-better/comment-page-1/#comment-81209</link>
		<dc:creator>Therabreath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/?p=319#comment-81209</guid>
		<description>I also believe that the old ugly sites have better content because during those times only well-researched, studied contents are being published in websites.  With the right designing of the website, it will really be as attractive as the newly designed ones and have more substancial contents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also believe that the old ugly sites have better content because during those times only well-researched, studied contents are being published in websites.  With the right designing of the website, it will really be as attractive as the newly designed ones and have more substancial contents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/2009/08/09/do-ugly-sites-perform-better/comment-page-1/#comment-81206</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tropicalwebworks.org/?p=319#comment-81206</guid>
		<description>And to think that I would spend so much time trying to make my site be &quot;pretty&quot;.  Your explanations make perfect sense.  The content is what is the &quot;lasting&quot; feature that draws people in and back often.  Thanks for a great post!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to think that I would spend so much time trying to make my site be &#8220;pretty&#8221;.  Your explanations make perfect sense.  The content is what is the &#8220;lasting&#8221; feature that draws people in and back often.  Thanks for a great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

